Citations

• Diomidis Spinellis. A tale of four kernels. In Wilhelm Schäfer, Matthew B. Dwyer, and Volker Gruhn, editors, ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 381–390, New York, May 2008. Association for Computing Machinery. (doi:10.1145/1368088.1368140)

• J.P. Correia and J. Visser. Benchmarking technical quality of software products. In Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, WCRE, pages 297–300, 2008. (doi:10.1109/WCRE.2008.16)

• Robert L. Glass. Open source vs. proprietary software: Yet another answer to the quality comparison. Software Practitioner, pages 1,4, 2008.

• O. Arafat and D. Riehle. The comment density of open source software code. In 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering — Companion Volume, ICSE 2009, pages 195–198, 2009. (doi:10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070980)

• O. Arafat and D. Riehle. The commenting practice of open source. In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA, pages 857–863, 2009. (doi:10.1145/1639950.1640047)

• A. Dedeke. Is Linux better than Windows software? IEEE Software, 26(3):103–104, May/June 2009. (doi:10.1109/MS.2009.72)

• F. Khomh, Y.-G. Guéhéneuc, and G. Antoniol. Playing roles in design patterns: An empirical descriptive and analytic study. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM, pages 83–92, 2009. (doi:10.1109/ICSM.2009.5306327)

• Y. Padioleau, L. Tan, and Y. Zhou. Listening to programmers - taxonomies and characteristics of comments in operating system code. In Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 331–341, 2009. (doi:10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070533)

• T.L. Alves, C. Ypma, and J. Visser. Deriving metric thresholds from benchmark data. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM, 2010. (doi:10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609747)

• E. Dodonov and R.F. de Mello. A novel approach for distributed application scheduling based on prediction of communication events. Future Generation Computer Systems, 26(5):740–752, 2010. (doi:10.1016/j.future.2009.05.004)

• A. Israeli and D.G. Feitelson. The Linux kernel as a case study in software evolution. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(3):485–501, 2010. (doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.042)

• B. Robinson and P. Francis. Improving industrial adoption of software engineering research: A comparison of open and closed source software. In ESEM 2010 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2010. (doi:10.1145/1852786.1852814)

• E. Capra, C. Francalanci, F. Merlo, and C. Rossi-Lamastra. Firms' involvement in open source projects: A trade-off between software structural quality and popularity. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(1):144–161, 2011. (doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.004)

• R. Tartler, D. Lohmann, J. Sincero, and W. Schröder-Preikschat. Feature consistency in compile-time - configurable system software: Facing the linux 10,000 feature problem. In EuroSys'11 - Proceedings of the EuroSys 2011 Conference, pages 47–60, 2011. (doi:10.1145/1966445.1966451)

Unless otherwise expressly stated, all original material on this page created by Diomidis Spinellis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Greece License.